<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: chooseinsurance &#8211; choose spam, choose quotezone, choose life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053</link>
	<description>Insurance Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:50:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkE</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-12644</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-12644</guid>
		<description>OMG just discovered that Tescofinance have hit position 3 in Google for &#039;car insurance&#039; with 1,250,000 links! Almost impressed by the audacity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG just discovered that Tescofinance have hit position 3 in Google for &#8216;car insurance&#8217; with 1,250,000 links! Almost impressed by the audacity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: em</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-11505</link>
		<dc:creator>em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-11505</guid>
		<description>@Ernie

I believe ComparetheMarket are using Tamar for their SEO, and having done a spot of analysis on some of their other clients last year (out of pure jealousy), they do seem to use a lot of grey if not black techniques. 

I&#039;d never seen a link farm before checking the backlinks of some of their other insurance clients...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ernie</p>
<p>I believe ComparetheMarket are using Tamar for their SEO, and having done a spot of analysis on some of their other clients last year (out of pure jealousy), they do seem to use a lot of grey if not black techniques. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d never seen a link farm before checking the backlinks of some of their other insurance clients&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernie</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-11459</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-11459</guid>
		<description>Comparethemarket.com has gone top on the car insurance term &#039;compare car insurance&#039; very quickly. Their rise has pushed Moneysupermarket into the number two spot (that will be annoying them) and as a result Moneysupermarket have gone top on PPC on that term.

The big question is how have comparethemarket done this? It&#039;s not by being a strong brand or good SEO I think, but I expect by &#039;link building&#039; and lots of them. I estimate they must be spending £20k-£30k per month and at that level their approach can&#039;t be ethical - does anyone know how long it takes Google spot this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparethemarket.com has gone top on the car insurance term &#8216;compare car insurance&#8217; very quickly. Their rise has pushed Moneysupermarket into the number two spot (that will be annoying them) and as a result Moneysupermarket have gone top on PPC on that term.</p>
<p>The big question is how have comparethemarket done this? It&#8217;s not by being a strong brand or good SEO I think, but I expect by &#8216;link building&#8217; and lots of them. I estimate they must be spending £20k-£30k per month and at that level their approach can&#8217;t be ethical &#8211; does anyone know how long it takes Google spot this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8607</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8607</guid>
		<description>ChooseInsurance experienced a brief ride at the top spot for [car insurance]. They have now been banished to the second page. Unlucky!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChooseInsurance experienced a brief ride at the top spot for [car insurance]. They have now been banished to the second page. Unlucky!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8085</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8085</guid>
		<description>@ Tron

I totally agree, this is extremely frustrating.  Google wants people to stay the right side of the white hat/black hat line but then fails to punish sites, like moneyexpert, who blatantly spam their way to the top of the SERPs

Moneyexpert have been top for [mortgages] and [loans] for months now using these unethical tactics and it seems Google is doing nothing about it.

And now they are working their way up for [car insurance] again using the same approach.

@Ernest

If moneyexpert are spamming their way to the top for [car insurance] again don&#039;t you think they deserve their own special entry on the site?  Then we can really take a look at their activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tron</p>
<p>I totally agree, this is extremely frustrating.  Google wants people to stay the right side of the white hat/black hat line but then fails to punish sites, like moneyexpert, who blatantly spam their way to the top of the SERPs</p>
<p>Moneyexpert have been top for [mortgages] and [loans] for months now using these unethical tactics and it seems Google is doing nothing about it.</p>
<p>And now they are working their way up for [car insurance] again using the same approach.</p>
<p>@Ernest</p>
<p>If moneyexpert are spamming their way to the top for [car insurance] again don&#8217;t you think they deserve their own special entry on the site?  Then we can really take a look at their activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tron</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8079</guid>
		<description>@Ernest - I agree entirely - it is one thing to see people maintaining prominent positions, but then to see recovery through such spammy and cheap tactics is frustrating.

[car insurance] and [mortgages] are two of the most popular searches in the finance field. Combined we would be looking in excess of 1.5m searches a month. They will be delivering hugely significant traffic numbers through a cloaked page and the spammiest of all spammy link networks.

It would also seem that Google&#039;s reporting facility is pretty much worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ernest &#8211; I agree entirely &#8211; it is one thing to see people maintaining prominent positions, but then to see recovery through such spammy and cheap tactics is frustrating.</p>
<p>[car insurance] and [mortgages] are two of the most popular searches in the finance field. Combined we would be looking in excess of 1.5m searches a month. They will be delivering hugely significant traffic numbers through a cloaked page and the spammiest of all spammy link networks.</p>
<p>It would also seem that Google&#8217;s reporting facility is pretty much worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8078</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8078</guid>
		<description>Still ..chooseinsurance.co.uk has taken a hit and dropped out of the top 15 results for [car insurance].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still ..chooseinsurance.co.uk has taken a hit and dropped out of the top 15 results for [car insurance].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8077</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8077</guid>
		<description>Money-sodding-expert.com have climbed back up to the 2nd page for the term [car insurance]. 

And 700k+ completely natural, not paid for in any way, absolutely ethical and wholly white hat backlinks. That&#039;s impressive in anyone&#039;s book.

Have you actually looked at their on-page optimisation for the term [car insurance] which Google is returning as their best result? It&#039;s not targetted to that term at all. Firstly, they&#039;re relying on the Big G to work its synonym magic (they&#039;re using motor insurance). And secondly, this only accounts for about 0.000001% of the page!

The more I look at Google&#039;s search results, the more I lose faith in the ethical, guideline orientated approach. Damn, the Big G is deserving of a huge slap around the chops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money-sodding-expert.com have climbed back up to the 2nd page for the term [car insurance]. </p>
<p>And 700k+ completely natural, not paid for in any way, absolutely ethical and wholly white hat backlinks. That&#8217;s impressive in anyone&#8217;s book.</p>
<p>Have you actually looked at their on-page optimisation for the term [car insurance] which Google is returning as their best result? It&#8217;s not targetted to that term at all. Firstly, they&#8217;re relying on the Big G to work its synonym magic (they&#8217;re using motor insurance). And secondly, this only accounts for about 0.000001% of the page!</p>
<p>The more I look at Google&#8217;s search results, the more I lose faith in the ethical, guideline orientated approach. Damn, the Big G is deserving of a huge slap around the chops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tron</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8060</link>
		<dc:creator>Tron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8060</guid>
		<description>@ Marcus - it is a bit of an odd one. I wonder if they have hired an agency and are unaware of the situation, or else is deliberate and are merely after the short term cash. Admittedly, there will be quite a lot of short term cash.

Whatever the case, they can&#039;t stay up there that long. I am amazed they have been permitted to get away with it for as long as they have already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Marcus &#8211; it is a bit of an odd one. I wonder if they have hired an agency and are unaware of the situation, or else is deliberate and are merely after the short term cash. Admittedly, there will be quite a lot of short term cash.</p>
<p>Whatever the case, they can&#8217;t stay up there that long. I am amazed they have been permitted to get away with it for as long as they have already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053/comment-page-1#comment-8000</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/chooseinsurance-choose-spam-choose-quotezone-choose-life/0053#comment-8000</guid>
		<description>Just had a look at the re-direct on their [mortgages] rankings, looks very black hat IMO.

The high volume of BLs also seems highly suspicious.

I&#039;m amazed MoneyExpert.com are willing to risk their long term brand reputation by using such methods.  It wasn&#039;t too long ago that Ocean Finance were hit hard by the big G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had a look at the re-direct on their [mortgages] rankings, looks very black hat IMO.</p>
<p>The high volume of BLs also seems highly suspicious.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed MoneyExpert.com are willing to risk their long term brand reputation by using such methods.  It wasn&#8217;t too long ago that Ocean Finance were hit hard by the big G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/23 queries in 0.149 seconds using disk

Served from: pickett.asmallorange.com @ 2010-03-12 08:43:58 -->