<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insiders View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk</link>
	<description>Insurance Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Keywords &#8211; the big boys</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/ppc-keywords-the-big-boys/001422</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/ppc-keywords-the-big-boys/001422#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This infographic from stateofsearch shows that gambling remains on top for the most expensive keywords. Source: StateOfSearch PPC Keywords &#8211; the big boys is a post from: Insiders View<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/ppc-keywords-the-big-boys/001422">PPC Keywords &#8211; the big boys</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This infographic from stateofsearch shows that gambling remains on top for the most expensive keywords.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1423" title="most-expensive-keywords" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/most-expensive-keywords-480x211.png" alt="" width="480" height="211" /></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.stateofsearch.com/uks-most-expensive-adwords-keywords/">StateOfSearch</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/ppc-keywords-the-big-boys/001422">PPC Keywords &#8211; the big boys</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/ppc-keywords-the-big-boys/001422/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Tier Finance Terms Still Targeted By Blackhats</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/top-tier-finance-terms-still-targeted-by-blackhats/001414</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/top-tier-finance-terms-still-targeted-by-blackhats/001414#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Top Tier finance terms, those that drive the most per click, are still being targeted by blackhats and spammers. sometimes these attacks (mainly against Google) last only a few days and sometimes only a few hours.They are, however, worthwhile. In a similar situation a whitehat internet market made $14K per month for appearing on [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/top-tier-finance-terms-still-targeted-by-blackhats/001414">Top Tier Finance Terms Still Targeted By Blackhats</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1416" title="car-insurance-serp" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/car-insurance-serp-480x217.png" alt="" width="480" height="217" /></p>
<p>Top Tier finance terms, those that drive the most per click, are still being targeted by blackhats and spammers. sometimes these attacks (mainly against Google) last only a few days and sometimes only a few hours.<span id="more-1414"></span>They are, however, worthwhile. In a similar situation a whitehat internet market <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/how-i-made-1349050-with-adsense-last-november">made $14K per month</a> for appearing on the first page of a highly trafficked keyphrase. Payday loans and Car Insurance Comparison are still very expensive terms that drive significant volumes.</p>
<h3>Pay Day Loan Fishing</h3>
<p>PayDay Loans are big business, but they can also be shady. Lead Generation is the name of the game in this niche.</p>
<blockquote><p>Booming payday lenders are prepared to pay big money for personal details of people looking for a loan, so-called &#8220;leads&#8221;.<br />
There&#8217;s a gold rush in lead ­generation, the murky world where marketers compete to find and sell these details</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2012/10/the-hacking-web-involving-payd.html">Mirror</a></p></blockquote>
<h3>Car Insurance SERP Hack</h3>
<blockquote><p>This short lived hack attempt lasted only a few hours but being on the first page of Gooogle for Car Insurance bring in significant traffic. It&#8217;s then about monetizing that traffic, normally through spammy lead gen or ads.<br />
The content on the site is very small, there’s nothing I could find that indicates hidden text or mass on-page spamming. Looking at the categories on the site it’s obvious this site is used to spam multiple categories/verticals as it’s all related<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.seounique.com/blog/new-major-serp-hack-in-the-uk/">SEO Unique</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Update:<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20406659">Payday loan firms warned by OFT</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/top-tier-finance-terms-still-targeted-by-blackhats/001414">Top Tier Finance Terms Still Targeted By Blackhats</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/top-tier-finance-terms-still-targeted-by-blackhats/001414/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should OFT approval require moneysavingexpert.com to be regulated by the Press Complaints Commission?</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/should-oft-approval-require-moneysavingexpert-com-to-be-regulated-by-the-press-complaints-committee/001389</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/should-oft-approval-require-moneysavingexpert-com-to-be-regulated-by-the-press-complaints-committee/001389#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Hendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Lewis, who last week sold his editorial business to FSA authorised and regulated Moneysupermarket.com Group plc, spent £1 million on the deal in legal fees. Much of this seems to have been spent on hammering out a 15 point so called editorial code, according to Lewis, who has been posting in defence of his [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/should-oft-approval-require-moneysavingexpert-com-to-be-regulated-by-the-press-complaints-committee/001389">Should OFT approval require moneysavingexpert.com to be regulated by the Press Complaints Commission?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Lewis, who last week sold his editorial business to FSA authorised and regulated Moneysupermarket.com Group plc, spent £1 million on the deal in legal fees. Much of this seems to have been spent on hammering out a 15 point so called <a title="So called editorial code" href="http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/site/2012/06/martin-lewis-on-moneysavingexpertcom-joining-the-moneysupermarket-group#ec">editorial code</a>, according to Lewis, who has been <a title="Martin Lewis defends the sale of his editorial website" href="http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=3996951">posting</a> in defence of his <a title="Some forumites have expressed the view that Lewis has sold out" href="http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?p=53495201#post53495201">sale</a> on his forum.</p>
<p>Lewis&#8217;s editorial code is not the official Editor&#8217;s Code being picked over at the Leveson Inquiry. This code is administered by the Press Complaints Commission. The printed media and their websites (with the exception of <a title="Richard Desmond's Northern &amp; Shell is not regulated by the PCC" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/jan/11/richard-desmond-pcc">Northern &amp; Shell</a>) pay a voluntary levy to the PCC  which hears complaints from the public against the press about inaccurate or misleading articles, invasions of privacy and other matters.</p>
<p>Rather than sign up to the PCC for a relatively small fee Lewis has instead spent a vast sum drawing up a private <a title="Editorial independence enshrined by lawyers" href="http://www.thelawyer.com/herbert-smith-and-olswang-advise-on-moneysavingexpert-sale/1012831.article">code</a> of his own. It seems an extraordinary amount for a man who refuses to pay over the odds for a can of cola.</p>
<p>Lewis, whose appears on Wikipedia as a <a title="Martin Lewis financial journalist" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Lewis_%28financial_journalist%29">financial journalist</a>, has always considered himself as such and his business an editorial one, with the freedom of the press. Asked by the chair of the Treasury Select Committee in 2010 who regulated him, Lewis said it was <a title="Chair: I want to end by asking who regulates you? Lewis: Nobody" href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtreasy/430/10101902.htm">nobody</a>. &#8216; I am a financial journalist and regulation of the media is an interesting one,&#8217; he said. In 2009, he corrected the Committee which seemed to think his business was a price comparison website: &#8216;We are not actually a price comparison site, we are an <a title="We are not a price comparison website" href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/treasury-committee/inquiries1/parliament-2005/credit-searches/">editorial site</a>,&#8217; he told MPs.In 2008, appearing on <a title="I have an editorial website" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rx-ySEKUURI">Channel 4 News</a>, he corrected Jon Snow&#8217;s misunderstanding about his business: &#8216;No Jon I think you are misunderstanding I have an editorial website&#8217;.</p>
<p>Now that his editorial business with its access to<a title="We have good relations with the American Express press office and they gave us this info without embargo, which is great." href="http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=23883617&amp;postcount=18"> press information</a> and the public through national broadcasters (*) is owned by a price comparison website, is it time the public had an independent regulator to complain to, even a feeble one like the PCC?</p>
<p>Lewis told the<a title="Martin Lewis tells 5 live about the sale of his business" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18296412"> BBC </a>his code has the power to fine Moneysupermarket.com a seven figure penalty for breach. The PCC lacks even the ability to fine. But is all this talk about paying lawyers a million pounds and seven figure fines preparatory work aimed at impressing the OFT, which has to approve the merger, when what such an influential media business needs is independent regulation?</p>
<p>*<a title="Flogging old stuff in time for Christmas" href="http://www.itv.com/daybreak/money/martinlewissection/martins-weekend-wallet-041117/">ITV Daybreak</a>, <em> <a title="ITV Lorraine Money" href="http://www.itv.com/lorraine/money/">ITV Lorraine</a>, <a title="BBC 1 Watchdog" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2012/05/savings_clinic.html">BBC 1 Watchdog</a>, </em><a title="BBC 2 How To Beat Tough Times" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p008tynb"><em>BBC 2 How To Beat Tough Times</em></a><em>, <a title="BBC 2 Jeremy Vine Show Martin Lewis financial journalist" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/shows/jeremy-vine/jeremys-contributors/">BBC Radio 2 Jeremy Vine Show</a>, <a title="BBC Radio 5 Shelagh Fogarty consumer team regular Martin Lewis How to manage your credit crads" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00n01qv">BBC Radio 5 Live Shelagh Fogarty</a>, <a title="BBC Radio 1 Jo Whiley Martin Lewis is a regular expert on Jo's show" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/jowhiley/martinlewis.shtml">BBC Radio 1 Jo Wiley</a>, <a title="It Pays To Watch" href="http://www.itpaystowatch.co.uk/">Channel 5 It Pays To Watch</a></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/should-oft-approval-require-moneysavingexpert-com-to-be-regulated-by-the-press-complaints-committee/001389">Should OFT approval require moneysavingexpert.com to be regulated by the Press Complaints Commission?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/should-oft-approval-require-moneysavingexpert-com-to-be-regulated-by-the-press-complaints-committee/001389/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martin Lewis Sells MoneySavingExpert and Makes £87 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-and-makes-87-million/001383</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-and-makes-87-million/001383#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Moneysavingexpert, set up in 2003, generating revenues of £16m per annum is sold for almost ninety million pounds to MoneySupermarket. &#8220;MoneySavingExpert.com has become part of people&#8217;s daily lives, far bigger than the man who founded it, and now is the right time for it to stand on its own two feet.&#8221; Martin Lewis who [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-and-makes-87-million/001383">Martin Lewis Sells MoneySavingExpert and Makes £87 Million</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1385" title="martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-moneysupermarket" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-moneysupermarket1.jpg" alt="" width="304" height="171" /></p>
<p>Moneysavingexpert, set up in 2003, generating revenues of £16m per annum is sold for almost ninety million pounds to MoneySupermarket.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;MoneySavingExpert.com has become part of people&#8217;s daily lives, far bigger than the man who founded it, and now is the right time for it to stand on its own two feet.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-1383"></span>Martin Lewis who owns 100% of the company is set to receive £35m plus shares worth £25m.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/martin-lewis-rich.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1386" title="martin-lewis-rich" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/martin-lewis-rich-480x254.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="254" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-and-makes-87-million/001383">Martin Lewis Sells MoneySavingExpert and Makes £87 Million</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/martin-lewis-sells-moneysavingexpert-and-makes-87-million/001383/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#moneysavingexpert shows @Pinterest how it is done</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Hendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robin Klein was quick to tweet news last week that UK consumer website moneysavingexpert.com is using Skimlinks to monetise its giant user generated forum. MSE had posted the news on its forum on Friday with a Q&#38;A explaining what Skimlinks is. This is a big deal for Skimlinks, a UK company that invisibly rewrites links [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360">#moneysavingexpert shows @Pinterest how it is done</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin Klein was quick to tweet news last week that UK consumer website moneysavingexpert.com is using Skimlinks to monetise its giant user generated forum. MSE had posted the news on its forum on Friday with a<a title="MSE Q&amp;A Skimlinks" href="http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/site/skimlinks" target="_blank"> Q&amp;A</a> explaining what Skimlinks is.<a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360/robinklein" rel="attachment wp-att-1361"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1361" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/robinklein-480x186.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="186" /></a></p>
<p>This is a big deal for Skimlinks, a UK company that invisibly rewrites links to ecommerce sites into links that retailers pay for, usually on a sales/lead generation cost per action basis. According to Hitwise, moneysavingexpert&#8217;s forum is the ninth biggest social network in the UK. Pinterest was the 46th most popular social site in the UK at the start of this year.</p>
<p>Klein who is an investor and board observer at Skimlinks will be hoping that being upfront about a technology designed so it can&#8217;t be seen will avoid a backlash from users. In February, Skimlinks was dropped by Pinterest after users complained about <a title="Pinterest challenge" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK8YFvjfpHs" target="_blank">surreptitious advertising</a> and worries about copyright and making money.</p>
<p>MSE is being selective about how it is using Skimlinks and says it is implementing a custom version. The technology will alter links for anyone using the forum without registering or logging in but it can be switched off by registering. The default setting for existing logged in forum users  is off with the option to turn it on. MSE has decided not to allow users to see which links are Skimlinked by adding an asterisk to disclose as it has with affiliate links until now. It is also making a distinction between Skimlinks and Skimwords, both link services from Skimlinks, saying:  <em></em></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><em>Important: Skimlinks also has a separate Skimwords software, which is intrusive and adds links to keywords. We&#8217;re not using that software, so please don&#8217;t confuse the two.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_1370" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 480px">
	<a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360/skimwordsnotok" rel="attachment wp-att-1370"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1370" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/skimwordsnotok-480x228.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="228" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Skimwords &#039;intrusive&#039;</p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left">The consumer website has kept Skimlinks off all its financial product or &#8216;money&#8217; boards. MSE site editor is Dan Plant who is a member of the Financial Services Consumer Panel. The panel was established by the FSA under FSMA to represent the interests of consumers. Plant brings to the panel &#8216;a strong passion for consumer protecti0n and responsibility&#8217;. That may not sit well if he works for a company that monetises links to financial products posted anonymously in a forum which welcomes users with the message &#8216;anyone can post please exercise caution&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">MSE has also kept Skimlinks off boards for gamblers and compers after users complained last year that any additional tracking could make them easier to spot and disqualify. From what Skimlinks CEO Alicia Navarro <a title="It’s not a secret. We do monetize social discovery, and it’s great" href="http://blog.skimlinks.com/2012/02/08/it%E2%80%99s-not-a-secret/" target="_blank">says</a> about the benefits of her technology, users may be right to be wary:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><em>&#8216;The data and analytics that we can provide about how community members are interacting with merchant and product information can be invaluable to publishers. The insights that can be gleaned by running Skimlinks have helped thousands of our publishers understand their customer base more, understand their shopping preferences, purchase behaviours, all without infringing on their privacy or interrupting their browsing experience. Publishers can then make decisions to focus more on certain users or products or merchants, with knowledge that their community respond well to these people and products. This is how merchants benefit, aside from the fact that by helping these sites fund themselves, they are creating future sources of new customers.&#8217;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Boards where Skimlinks is being used include Discount Codes &#8216;n Vouchers where users share codes. It is fairly common for retailers to manage how codes issued to consumers can be redeemed through affiliate links. ASDA requires affiliates to only use voucher codes specifically issued for affiliates. Debenhams has closed its program to voucher code affiliates saying it is unable to recruit anymore. MSE has tried to address potential conflicts between it and its users&#8217; competing commissions. The custom version it is running allows users to copy and paste links unaltered instead of clicking on them which automatically adds Skimlinks&#8217; tracking.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">If retailers do start to treat forum users any differently for having clicked through on unseen affiliate links and used codes for consumers, MSE may face a backlash. In its Q&amp;A, it says it reserves the right to add Skimlinks to more boards. It may need to take it off boards if users who post content, unpaid, and moderators who run boards, unpaid, decide they don&#8217;t want it.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">MSE is not the huge site it is today without listening to its users. Provided it continues to do so, this could be a partnership that strengthens UK companies competing in a sector dominated by the US.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360">#moneysavingexpert shows @Pinterest how it is done</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysavingexpert-shows-pinterest-how-it-is-done/001360/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something odd about an IP address</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/something-odd-about-an-ip-address/001346</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/something-odd-about-an-ip-address/001346#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Hendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Lewis&#8217; (financial journalist) Wikipedia page which has been revised several hundred times has recent edits by an IP address associated with Lewis. IP address  93.152.127.10 has edited Lewis&#8217; page, and the Wiki entry for moneysavingexpert.com, a site owned by Lewis, 13 times. Smtp.tunechecker.com and mail3.moneysavingexpert.com point to 93.152.127.10. Tunechecker.com and moneysavingexpert.com use 93.152.127.10 as [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/something-odd-about-an-ip-address/001346">Something odd about an IP address</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/something-odd-about-an-ip-address/001346/martinlewiswikipage" rel="attachment wp-att-1347"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1347" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/martinlewiswikipage-480x269.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>Martin Lewis&#8217; (financial journalist) Wikipedia page which has been revised several hundred times has recent edits by an IP address associated with Lewis.</p>
<p>IP address  93.152.127.10 has edited Lewis&#8217; page, and the Wiki entry for moneysavingexpert.com, a site owned by Lewis, 13 times.</p>
<p>Smtp.tunechecker.com and mail3.moneysavingexpert.com point to 93.152.127.10. Tunechecker.com and moneysavingexpert.com use 93.152.127.10 as a mail server, according to domain search site Robtex.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/something-odd-about-an-ip-address/001346">Something odd about an IP address</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/something-odd-about-an-ip-address/001346/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finance and Insurance #1 Annual Google Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/finance-and-insurance-1-annual-google-spending/001342</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/finance-and-insurance-1-annual-google-spending/001342#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google revenues are still benefiting from insurance and finance &#8211; The Top Dog for online advertising. Source: Wordstream Finance and Insurance #1 Annual Google Spending is a post from: Insiders View<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/finance-and-insurance-1-annual-google-spending/001342">Finance and Insurance #1 Annual Google Spending</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/finance-insurance-google-spending.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1343" title="finance-insurance-google-spending" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/finance-insurance-google-spending.png" alt="" width="405" height="479" /></a></p>
<p>Google revenues are still benefiting from insurance and finance &#8211; The Top Dog for online advertising.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2012/01/23/google-revenues">Wordstream</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/finance-and-insurance-1-annual-google-spending/001342">Finance and Insurance #1 Annual Google Spending</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/finance-and-insurance-1-annual-google-spending/001342/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whitelabeled Comparison Sites At Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/whitelabeled-comparison-sites-at-risk/001337</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/whitelabeled-comparison-sites-at-risk/001337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After new FSA insurance comparison guidelines were released in Octobter, they have taken action against ArgosComapare by closing it down. sometimes it is unclear exactly who is responsible for pointing a customer towards a certain insurance product. By extension, it is therefore unclear to whom a customer should complain if things go wrong. FSA spokesman [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/whitelabeled-comparison-sites-at-risk/001337">Whitelabeled Comparison Sites At Risk</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After new FSA insurance comparison guidelines were <a href="http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/guidance/fg11_17.pdf">released </a>in Octobter, they have taken action against ArgosComapare by closing it down.<span id="more-1337"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>sometimes it is unclear exactly who is responsible for pointing a customer towards a certain insurance product. By extension, it is therefore unclear to whom a customer should complain if things go wrong.<br />
FSA spokesman</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/whitelabeled-comparison-sites-at-risk/001337">Whitelabeled Comparison Sites At Risk</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/whitelabeled-comparison-sites-at-risk/001337/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google made 6.8 Billion Dollars on Insurance Last Year</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/6-8-billion-dollars-google-insurance/001331</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/6-8-billion-dollars-google-insurance/001331#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s revenue last year was close to $29 Billion. If you look at how much of their revenue comes from search advertising (mainly Google Adwords), this equates to 28.4B. Now let&#8217;s look at how much of that comes from Insurance According to Wordstream, the number one money earner (in terms of Cost Per Click) are [...]<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/6-8-billion-dollars-google-insurance/001331">Google made 6.8 Billion Dollars on Insurance Last Year</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/6.8billion-dollars.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1332" title="6.8billion-dollars" src="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/6.8billion-dollars-373x800.png" alt="" width="373" height="800" /></a><br />
Google&#8217;s revenue last year was close to $29 Billion. If you look at how much of their revenue comes from search advertising (mainly Google Adwords), this equates to 28.4B. Now let&#8217;s look at how much of that comes from Insurance<span id="more-1331"></span><br />
According to <a href="http://www.wordstream.com/articles/most-expensive-keywords">Wordstream</a>, the number one money earner (in terms of Cost Per Click) are insurance related terms. This works out at a whopping <strong>6.8 BILLION DOLLARS</strong> just for insurance related terms in one year.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/6-8-billion-dollars-google-insurance/001331">Google made 6.8 Billion Dollars on Insurance Last Year</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/6-8-billion-dollars-google-insurance/001331/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content and Infographics still SEO Royalty</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/content-and-infographics-still-seo-royalty/001327</link>
		<comments>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/content-and-infographics-still-seo-royalty/001327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=1327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Content and Infographics still SEO Royalty is a post from: Insiders View<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/content-and-infographics-still-seo-royalty/001327">Content and Infographics still SEO Royalty</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.brafton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/WhyContentForSEO_FINAL_2.png"><img class="alignnone" title="SEO Royalty" src="http://cdn.brafton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/WhyContentForSEO_FINAL_2.png" alt="" width="126" height="344" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/content-and-infographics-still-seo-royalty/001327">Content and Infographics still SEO Royalty</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk">Insiders View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/content-and-infographics-still-seo-royalty/001327/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
