<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoCompare Banned from Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096</link>
	<description>Insurance Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:50:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-51233</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-51233</guid>
		<description>I wish someone would shoot that make believe opera singer who murders that go compare advert, he puts me and others right off the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish someone would shoot that make believe opera singer who murders that go compare advert, he puts me and others right off the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-41043</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-41043</guid>
		<description>Gocompare are indeed now on page 2. But this article was written on Jan 29th so it&#039;s probably acceptable it&#039;s a little out of date.
Perhaps we should close comments on old posts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gocompare are indeed now on page 2. But this article was written on Jan 29th so it&#8217;s probably acceptable it&#8217;s a little out of date.<br />
Perhaps we should close comments on old posts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Bohan</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-41036</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Bohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-41036</guid>
		<description>Go compare on page two google for car insurance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go compare on page two google for car insurance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoCompare link spamming again &#124; Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimisation Blog UK</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-38221</link>
		<dc:creator>GoCompare link spamming again &#124; Internet Marketing and Search Engine Optimisation Blog UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-38221</guid>
		<description>[...] January this year GoCompare was hit with a penalty from Google for what would appear to be paid links. Once they had cleaned up some of the backlinks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January this year GoCompare was hit with a penalty from Google for what would appear to be paid links. Once they had cleaned up some of the backlinks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What happened to GoCompare? – Their Banning, Penalty &#38; Re-inclusion into Google</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-33366</link>
		<dc:creator>What happened to GoCompare? – Their Banning, Penalty &#38; Re-inclusion into Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-33366</guid>
		<description>[...] 29th 2008 GoCompare’s Previous Penalty – Insidersview notice GoCompare have lost a huge number of their rankings including cash cow term ‘car insurance’ and branded terms. Many including Blogstorm imply this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 29th 2008 GoCompare’s Previous Penalty – Insidersview notice GoCompare have lost a huge number of their rankings including cash cow term ‘car insurance’ and branded terms. Many including Blogstorm imply this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-33129</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-33129</guid>
		<description>GoCompare Penalised by Google... Again

I haven&#039;t had much of a look into this but I dont think this will be a full 3 month penalization like back in Jan. Will dig a bit deeper and have a good look at the backlink history and review in detail. Yet I think it is due to incorrect transition of the new site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoCompare Penalised by Google&#8230; Again</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had much of a look into this but I dont think this will be a full 3 month penalization like back in Jan. Will dig a bit deeper and have a good look at the backlink history and review in detail. Yet I think it is due to incorrect transition of the new site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-26750</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-26750</guid>
		<description>A lot of these price comparison sites have little real content on them and are up there via links, it does not surprise me that most are paid for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of these price comparison sites have little real content on them and are up there via links, it does not surprise me that most are paid for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-20379</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-20379</guid>
		<description>Stumbled across this blog and thought I&#039;d check google.co.uk results and see GoCompare on page 2. A pretty big climb I suppose since last post on this subject (March)

What&#039;s this about a ban?

And this post http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysupermarket-banned-by-google-for-spamming/0045

??

Me no see no bans on either of these, or moneyexpert, asdafinance, etc. ad nauseum!

Here&#039;s my &quot;idiotic&quot; guess, people complain to G, G manually checks the site(s), G thinks &quot;hey, they seem reputable&quot; (as opposed to the cheap/spammy looking sites of the wannabes) and lets them slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled across this blog and thought I&#8217;d check google.co.uk results and see GoCompare on page 2. A pretty big climb I suppose since last post on this subject (March)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s this about a ban?</p>
<p>And this post <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysupermarket-banned-by-google-for-spamming/0045" rel="nofollow">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/moneysupermarket-banned-by-google-for-spamming/0045</a></p>
<p>??</p>
<p>Me no see no bans on either of these, or moneyexpert, asdafinance, etc. ad nauseum!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my &#8220;idiotic&#8221; guess, people complain to G, G manually checks the site(s), G thinks &#8220;hey, they seem reputable&#8221; (as opposed to the cheap/spammy looking sites of the wannabes) and lets them slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-14696</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-14696</guid>
		<description>@Andy,
Defintely not. There&#039;s a fairly complicated algorithm at work based on many factors including IMHO:
- History of spam reports
- Whether the site has been flagged as suspicious
- How many other reports have been filed against that domain
- Whether the site contains adult content
- [Insert variable here]

Only then is a site reviewed for the Big G Handjob. This can take between 2 days and infinity. Unless you can have a word with Matt or GoogleGuy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy,<br />
Defintely not. There&#8217;s a fairly complicated algorithm at work based on many factors including IMHO:<br />
- History of spam reports<br />
- Whether the site has been flagged as suspicious<br />
- How many other reports have been filed against that domain<br />
- Whether the site contains adult content<br />
- [Insert variable here]</p>
<p>Only then is a site reviewed for the Big G Handjob. This can take between 2 days and infinity. Unless you can have a word with Matt or GoogleGuy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096/comment-page-1#comment-14686</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/gocompare-banned-from-google/0096#comment-14686</guid>
		<description>Does it take just one proven report to google to get blacklisted (-50 results)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it take just one proven report to google to get blacklisted (-50 results)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/23 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: pickett.asmallorange.com @ 2010-03-12 14:07:28 -->