Insurance Comparison: Defaqto or Defalseto?

by Ernest on July 18, 2007

Defaqto are a relatively successful company who seem to fit the company model of “monkeys on typewriters”. I mean that in a nice way because that’s exactly what they’re saving their clients from! Defaqto clients pretty much use them to outsource all of the hassle, cost, management and ball ache which comes with data collation and research. To this end, they have become a significant contributor in areas of personal insurance as well as wider markets. They simply employ a lot of people, to cover a lot of ground and dig up the minute details in particular areas.

Filling this sort of role, you’d expect that they’d live and die by the information they provide their clients and their customers. Wouldn’t you?!

Over the last few weeks, you may have noticed the press releases about Defaqto’s new insurance comparison tool. Having seen Defaqto solve a few personal finance riddles through data collation, I was a little more than excited. I wasn’t expecting an all-singing-all-dancing screenscraping comparison solution by any means. But I was hoping to see them fill that crucial gap between the established comparison sites/screenscrapers and the insurance providers – where the important information on policy content is stored. Where transparency is sort for all of five seconds before the customer gives up and buys the cheapest (probably least suitable) policy of the two and a half forms they’ve filled out online.

So, off I sauntered to the Find website (yes, they’re still around – although not so much in Google nowadays!) where they have implemented the Defaqto insurance comparison tool already. Once I’d turned Javascript on (!), I saw a very simple interface which seemed to match the contents of policies offered by UK insurance providers against each other. Easy to understand and basic functionality.

Make or break!

However, it is the crucial validity of their data which makes or breaks a tool like this. One simple error and your faith in all the rest is lost. Hundreds of thousands of man hours and enough money to make Richard Branson blush, all flushed down the loo in an instant.

I started checking the subtle differences between the Budget brands, the Admiral brands, the RBS brands and so on (I know, I need to get out more). Impressed by the seemingly endless list of insurance providers, I started scanning for any missing names …Highway, Honda, HSBC, IBuyEco, Insurancewide, Insure… Hold on a minute! Insurancewide.com?!

OK, so Insurancewide may not be the brand name which rolls of every insurance customer’s tongue but an insurance company? I think not? How has Defaqto managed to put them forward as an insurance company? Worse still, they’ve even managed to supply policy details! Where did they pull them from? They don’t even sell policies. They compare them. It’s probably fair to say that Insurancewide don’t really explain what they do and how they do it very well (perhaps intentional, perhaps not), but to put them down as an insurance provider …and to them put forward their policy details? They’ve even got “insurer comparison service” in the first line of the first paragraph on their homepage for God’s sake!!

Break!

How useful is Defaqto insurance comparison?

The tool may provide some useful data in a quicker format than reading the policy documents of each and every insurance brand in their list. But it’s a dangerous tool to put out there considering it’s based on static data gathered by low paid researchers who churn through policy documents day-in, day-out. When accuracy the sword you swear to defend, don’t go waving it dangerously between your legs like that!!

What if a customer uses the tool instead of reading the policy documents for themselves? Do you think they’re all aware that the insurers can offer different policies from one day to the next, faster than Defaqto can update their static databases? That the insurers may offer you a different policy depending on your profile and what they’re willing to offer you because of the risk presented? That the same insurer, brand name or underwriter may offer you a different policy depending on which broker or intermediary you’ve accessed them through? Or that some insurers manage to offer stripped down policies through insurance comparison sites to make the prices look more attractive?

I don’t blame Defaqto for having a stab at this. The policy content is probably the most important element missing from the insurance comparison tools currently on the market – something which GoCompare have attempted to remedy to some extent. But seeing one mistake like this from Defaqto and the rest just shatters and falls into a million little pieces.

Defaqto’s small print

The irony of all this is that this tool should save the customer from having to read the small print. But it is Defaqto (or Find) who have included a sort of small print/disclaimer to cover themselves for the timeliness or their updates, that the policy comparisons match typical levels of cover and that they may have been sourced through intermediaries or brokers. Basically, saying this information may be utterly worthless to you but you won’t read this anyway so it doesn’t really matter.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

Kate Marsden July 26, 2007 at 4:58 pm

Dear Earnest and George

Thank you for spending the time to research, and write about, Defaqto’s Compare! tool. I’m delighted that you appreciate the value it’s adding in raising awareness of policy differences in a very price-focused market.

With respect to the inclusion of Insurancewide.com as a policy provider: until a few weeks ago they had a product on their site called “insurancewide.com motor insurance”. This was a white-labelled motor policy arranged by Equity Insurance Brokers (who part own Insurancewide) and underwritten by various underwriters at Lloyd’s of London. This policy has since been removed from their site, and our records updated (as you suggest, it would have been quite bizarre for us to have simply made it up, as they’re not even a direct seller).

White-labelling policies under different brand names is a regular occurrence, and typically we show the brand name that the customer would engage with, rather than the name of the ultimate underwriter.

Defaqto fully recognise the critical importance of timely and accurate data to our, and our customers’, businesses, and we value the efforts our much-loved, professional research team put in to making this happen. If you’d like to come and visit us to see what we get up to in more detail, then please do get in touch.

Kind regards

Kate Marsden
Marketing Director, Defaqto Group
kmarsden@defaqto.com

Ernest July 27, 2007 at 9:45 am

DeFALSEto then!!!

Insurancewide are a COMPARISON service. You wouldn’t go through Confused.com and claim that all of the policies in their results are sold by them and underwritten by Admiral …or would you?!

So why do your guys think this is (or has been) the case for Insurancewide?

They’ve never sold a car insurance policy of their own …trust me, we spend enough time talking to and monitoring all of the comparison and broker websites to know when they change a comment tag in their mark up, let alone something as obvious as that! Perhaps someone from Insurancewide can comment on this to confirm?

I’m afraid you’ve just made the validity of your data and “professional” research team even worse. Shame.

Kate Marsden July 27, 2007 at 10:28 am

Dear Ernest
We’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. There was a policy that Insurancewide.com had on their site that appeared to be under their own name. As Defaqto cover whole of market, it was naturally included.
Again, if you’d like to discuss this with our insurance team in more detail, then please let me know.
Kind regards
Kate Marsden
Marketing Director, Defaqto Group

Ernest July 27, 2007 at 11:00 am

Or we can wait and see if anyone from IW picks this up and wants to clear it up for us?

TheSEOVirgin July 31, 2007 at 5:44 pm

What did you guys have for tea last night?

Tron August 1, 2007 at 3:49 pm

I am going off topic again. Admittedly not as much as the esteemed poster before me, but thought you might be interested in seeing beat that quote’s new advert…

http://www.beatthatquote.com/fun/

It has been pretty well publicised that they are about to spend an awful lot of money on ATL marketing. Presumably this will be on media then…? ;o)

Ernest August 2, 2007 at 5:47 pm

Hmmmmm. In-ter-est-ing!

Where do you hail from “TheSEOVirgin”?

James Harrison August 3, 2007 at 5:11 pm

I hope I can clear this matter up:

Insurancewide.com did used to sell policies under its own name but ceased doing so in 2004.

I seem to remember informing Defaqto of this fact myself a couple of years ago. Anyway thankyou to Ernest and George for picking this up and thank you Kate for removing us from your database!

Regards,
James Harrison
CEO, Insurancewide.com

Andrew Akerman August 21, 2007 at 5:34 pm

Hi guys, need a favour please. Can you give me Hayley Parsons email or phone please?

Ernest May 22, 2008 at 5:32 pm

I called it!!

Moments before the press release went out, I called it that Tesco Compare would be top of DeFaqto’s latest ‘rating’ report of comparison websites. Not difficult when you see who’s paying their wages ;)

In all fairness to Tesco, they could well be the best ones out there for the comparison product they deliver. But quite honestly, isn’t it a bit embarrassing to be using static data when you can collect it all dynamically with a little bit of work these days?!

Leave a Comment