<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kwik Fit Insurance Banned by Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100</link>
	<description>Insurance Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:50:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google targeting UK car insurance industry &#124; SEOptimise</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-15503</link>
		<dc:creator>Google targeting UK car insurance industry &#124; SEOptimise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-15503</guid>
		<description>[...] doesn&#8217;t yet seem to be the case with Kwik Fit apparently suffering a minus 50 penalty after aggressively trying to rank their kwik-fit-insurance.com domain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doesn&#8217;t yet seem to be the case with Kwik Fit apparently suffering a minus 50 penalty after aggressively trying to rank their kwik-fit-insurance.com domain. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech blog</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>lol, latitude those muppets from wigan or wherever got them whacked :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, latitude those muppets from wigan or wherever got them whacked <img src='http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14456</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14456</guid>
		<description>@Ernest, @Creased,
Check out the anchor text and IBLs they have been targeting on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/bestdealinsurance-and-bestdealinsurancecouk-banned-penalised-from-google/00102&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bestdealinsurance ban&lt;/a&gt; page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ernest, @Creased,<br />
Check out the anchor text and IBLs they have been targeting on the <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/bestdealinsurance-and-bestdealinsurancecouk-banned-penalised-from-google/00102" rel="nofollow">bestdealinsurance ban</a> page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14448</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14448</guid>
		<description>@Creased - I noticed that too but they&#039;ve managed to maintain their top spot for [life insurance] for the time being. Did their backlink anchor text revolve mainly around car and home or is this a sign of a manual edit whereby life insurance key phrases simply don&#039;t receive enough traffic for intervention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Creased &#8211; I noticed that too but they&#8217;ve managed to maintain their top spot for [life insurance] for the time being. Did their backlink anchor text revolve mainly around car and home or is this a sign of a manual edit whereby life insurance key phrases simply don&#8217;t receive enough traffic for intervention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creased</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14446</link>
		<dc:creator>Creased</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14446</guid>
		<description>The latest to feel the Google Slap - Best Deal. On my DC this morning they have been dumped into the mid 40s for their top terms. 

They were #1 for &#039;home insurance&#039; - i had noticed their backlinks were in the form of dodgy html banners on really irrelevant websites of all languages - so i&#039;m not surprised. 

They did dip into the top 10 for car insurance a few times over the last few weeks - but I doubt this will make the headlines like GC did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest to feel the Google Slap &#8211; Best Deal. On my DC this morning they have been dumped into the mid 40s for their top terms. </p>
<p>They were #1 for &#8216;home insurance&#8217; &#8211; i had noticed their backlinks were in the form of dodgy html banners on really irrelevant websites of all languages &#8211; so i&#8217;m not surprised. </p>
<p>They did dip into the top 10 for car insurance a few times over the last few weeks &#8211; but I doubt this will make the headlines like GC did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google banner</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14405</link>
		<dc:creator>google banner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14405</guid>
		<description>Well thats Search latitude for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thats Search latitude for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikel</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14202</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14202</guid>
		<description>@Creased 

What about Asda&#039;s hidden text links on http://www.michigandaily.com/. If you have a search in the page source you will find a nice link to asdafinance in a section containing a  using &quot;display: none;&quot;

Do you think they are still using black hat techniques?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Creased </p>
<p>What about Asda&#8217;s hidden text links on <a href="http://www.michigandaily.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.michigandaily.com/</a>. If you have a search in the page source you will find a nice link to asdafinance in a section containing a  using &#8220;display: none;&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you think they are still using black hat techniques?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creased</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14168</link>
		<dc:creator>Creased</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14168</guid>
		<description>It looks like there is hope for GoCompare/Kwik Fit - Asda is appearing back in my DCs Top 10 for &#039;car insurance&#039;. They were dropped last year for dark-grey-hat techniques. At first glance their black links now seem mostly strong and relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there is hope for GoCompare/Kwik Fit &#8211; Asda is appearing back in my DCs Top 10 for &#8216;car insurance&#8217;. They were dropped last year for dark-grey-hat techniques. At first glance their black links now seem mostly strong and relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick- Insurance - SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-14083</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick- Insurance - SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-14083</guid>
		<description>Back to Kwik Fit, does Google actually &#039;sand box&#039; these days? there is an article wikipedia about it.

Worth checking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to Kwik Fit, does Google actually &#8217;sand box&#8217; these days? there is an article wikipedia about it.</p>
<p>Worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100/comment-page-1#comment-13957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/kwik-fit-insurance-banned-by-google/00100#comment-13957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also seeing Q4 across a number of data centres. I&#039;ver been watching them for a long while now and they&#039;ve had a sudden surge in in-bound links.

Although there are tonnes from one domain (audifans.net), they&#039;ve managed to spread a fair few paid for links across a number of car related sites. But my favourite has to be whoisjeffmills.com. What a complete american loser (I get distracted easily!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also seeing Q4 across a number of data centres. I&#8217;ver been watching them for a long while now and they&#8217;ve had a sudden surge in in-bound links.</p>
<p>Although there are tonnes from one domain (audifans.net), they&#8217;ve managed to spread a fair few paid for links across a number of car related sites. But my favourite has to be whoisjeffmills.com. What a complete american loser (I get distracted easily!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/23 queries in 0.282 seconds using disk

Served from: pickett.asmallorange.com @ 2010-03-12 08:46:02 -->