<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fall of a Life Broker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/00705</link>
	<description>Insurance Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:10:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/00705/comment-page-1#comment-48662</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=705#comment-48662</guid>
		<description>I do hope this isn&#039;t true but have my fears. Lost some money last year with another broker who went bust.

I guess we all take a risk when we deal with the sharks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do hope this isn&#8217;t true but have my fears. Lost some money last year with another broker who went bust.</p>
<p>I guess we all take a risk when we deal with the sharks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Out of Pocket</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/00705/comment-page-1#comment-48612</link>
		<dc:creator>Out of Pocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=705#comment-48612</guid>
		<description>Great post.

Well reasoned and obviously written from bitter experience.

What I can&#039;t get a handle on is why the providers still give them access some pretty attractive productss, given the unsustainable claw-back levels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.</p>
<p>Well reasoned and obviously written from bitter experience.</p>
<p>What I can&#8217;t get a handle on is why the providers still give them access some pretty attractive productss, given the unsustainable claw-back levels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lone Ranger</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/00705/comment-page-1#comment-48598</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lone Ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=705#comment-48598</guid>
		<description>Hmmm,

I wonder who these unscrupilous people could be????

String em up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm,</p>
<p>I wonder who these unscrupilous people could be????</p>
<p>String em up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/00705/comment-page-1#comment-48178</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=705#comment-48178</guid>
		<description>Interesting story.  I don&#039;t know the life business at all, so I don&#039;t know the company that is referred to here.

I recently had to do a lot of research in to UK libel laws - to see what you could and couldn&#039;t say about someone without fear of an expensive law suit.  I was fortunate to be given some free advice by corporate lawyers and also a Barrister.

There are two bits that I believe are relevant, so I will summarise what they told me as:

1. It doesn&#039;t matter what you know to be true - you have to be able to prove to the court that what you said was true of the person/organisation.

2. If what you have said is about an identifyable group of people - then each person in that group potentially has a case against you for libel.  The example given was that if you said &#039;all of the Police at x station are crooked (not the word I was going to use!)&#039; - then each Officer working from that station could have a claim against you for libel, unless you could prove to the court that he or she was crooked.

So, I worry on your behalf as to whether:

1. Many people in the industry will know the company and the individuals that you are talking about - and hence the targets could claim that their reputation in their own industry is affected by what is written here.

2. Is everything that you&#039;ve said true? - there&#039;s some pretty strong allegations there...

It&#039;s obvious to me that you are writing with probably very good intent - but that isn&#039;t a defence to libel and so it would be shame if you were to suffer as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting story.  I don&#8217;t know the life business at all, so I don&#8217;t know the company that is referred to here.</p>
<p>I recently had to do a lot of research in to UK libel laws &#8211; to see what you could and couldn&#8217;t say about someone without fear of an expensive law suit.  I was fortunate to be given some free advice by corporate lawyers and also a Barrister.</p>
<p>There are two bits that I believe are relevant, so I will summarise what they told me as:</p>
<p>1. It doesn&#8217;t matter what you know to be true &#8211; you have to be able to prove to the court that what you said was true of the person/organisation.</p>
<p>2. If what you have said is about an identifyable group of people &#8211; then each person in that group potentially has a case against you for libel.  The example given was that if you said &#8216;all of the Police at x station are crooked (not the word I was going to use!)&#8217; &#8211; then each Officer working from that station could have a claim against you for libel, unless you could prove to the court that he or she was crooked.</p>
<p>So, I worry on your behalf as to whether:</p>
<p>1. Many people in the industry will know the company and the individuals that you are talking about &#8211; and hence the targets could claim that their reputation in their own industry is affected by what is written here.</p>
<p>2. Is everything that you&#8217;ve said true? &#8211; there&#8217;s some pretty strong allegations there&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious to me that you are writing with probably very good intent &#8211; but that isn&#8217;t a defence to libel and so it would be shame if you were to suffer as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About Time</title>
		<link>http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/the-fall-of-a-life-broker/00705/comment-page-1#comment-48166</link>
		<dc:creator>About Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/?p=705#comment-48166</guid>
		<description>I know a couple of people who have been caught by them. Nice to hear somebody&#039;s prepared to fight back at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a couple of people who have been caught by them. Nice to hear somebody&#8217;s prepared to fight back at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: www.insiders-view.co.uk @ 2010-09-07 06:04:12 -->